Archives of Neuroscience

Published by: Kowsar

The Effect of Remote Patient Monitoring on Patients with Spinal Cord Injury: A Mini-Review

Nafise Mazboori 1 , Abbas Norouzi Javidan 1 , * and Parisa Bahmani 1
Authors Information
1 Brain and Spinal Cord Injury Research Center, Neuroscience Institute, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
Article information
  • Archives of Neuroscience: April 30, 2019, 6 (2); e85491
  • Published Online: February 19, 2019
  • Article Type: Review Article
  • Received: October 17, 2018
  • Revised: January 2, 2019
  • Accepted: January 23, 2019
  • DOI: 10.5812/ans.85491

To Cite: Mazboori N, Norouzi Javidan A, Bahmani P. The Effect of Remote Patient Monitoring on Patients with Spinal Cord Injury: A Mini-Review, Arch Neurosci. 2019 ; 6(2):e85491. doi: 10.5812/ans.85491.

Abstract
Copyright © 2019, Archives of Neuroscience. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits copy and redistribute the material just in noncommercial usages, provided the original work is properly cited.
1. Context
2. Methods
3. Results
4. Discussion
Footnotes
References
  • 1. Elshahidi MH, Monir NY, Elzhery MA, Sharaqi AA, Haedaya H, Awad BI, et al. Epidemiological characteristics of traumatic spinal cord injury (TSCI) in the Middle-East and North-Africa (MENA) region: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Bull Emerg Trauma. 2018;6(2):75-89. doi: 10.29252/beat-060201. [PubMed: 29719837]. [PubMed Central: PMC5928263].
  • 2. Orr MB, Gensel JC. Spinal cord injury scarring and inflammation: Therapies targeting glial and inflammatory responses. Neurotherapeutics. 2018;15(3):541-53. doi: 10.1007/s13311-018-0631-6. [PubMed: 29717413]. [PubMed Central: PMC6095779].
  • 3. Marziniak M, Brichetto G, Feys P, Meyding-Lamade U, Vernon K, Meuth SG. The use of digital and remote communication technologies as a tool for multiple sclerosis management: narrative review. JMIR Rehabil Assist Technol. 2018;5(1). e5. doi: 10.2196/rehab.7805. [PubMed: 29691208]. [PubMed Central: PMC5941090].
  • 4. Bragg DD, Edis H, Clark S, Parsons SL, Perumpalath B, Lobo DN, et al. Development of a telehealth monitoring service after colorectal surgery: A feasibility study. World J Gastrointest Surg. 2017;9(9):193-9. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v9.i9.193. [PubMed: 29081902]. [PubMed Central: PMC5633533].
  • 5. Ciemins EL, Coon PJ, Coombs NC, Holloway BL, Mullette EJ, Dudley WN. Intent-to-treat analysis of a simultaneous multisite telehealth diabetes prevention program. BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care. 2018;6(1). e000515. doi: 10.1136/bmjdrc-2018-000515. [PubMed: 29713481]. [PubMed Central: PMC5922481].
  • 6. Heldman DA, Harris DA, Felong T, Andrzejewski KL, Dorsey ER, Giuffrida JP, et al. Telehealth management of Parkinson's disease using wearable sensors: An exploratory study. Digit Biomark. 2017;1(1):43-51. doi: 10.1159/000475801. [PubMed: 29725667]. [PubMed Central: PMC5927622].
  • 7. Mousa AY, Broce M, Davis E, McKee B, Yacoub M. Telehealth electronic monitoring to reduce postdischarge complications and surgical site infections after arterial revascularization with groin incision. J Vasc Surg. 2017;66(6):1902-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2017.07.063. [PubMed: 29169546].
  • 8. Schusterbauer V, Feitek D, Kastner P, Toplak H. Two-stage evaluation of a telehealth nutrition management service in support of diabesity therapy. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2018;248:314-21. [PubMed: 29726453].
  • 9. Cardinale AM. The opportunity for telehealth to support neurological healthcare. Telemed J E Health. 2018. doi: 10.1089/tmj.2017.0290. [PubMed: 29652625].
  • 10. Martinez RN, Hogan TP, Balbale S, Lones K, Goldstein B, Woo C, et al. Sociotechnical perspective on implementing clinical video telehealth for veterans with spinal cord injuries and disorders. Telemed J E Health. 2017;23(7):567-76. doi: 10.1089/tmj.2016.0200. [PubMed: 28067586]. [PubMed Central: PMC5802248].
  • 11. Tenforde AS, Hefner JE, Kodish-Wachs JE, Iaccarino MA, Paganoni S. Telehealth in physical medicine and rehabilitation: A narrative review. PM R. 2017;9(5S):S51-8. doi: 10.1016/j.pmrj.2017.02.013. [PubMed: 28527504].
  • 12. Yozbatiran N, Harness ET, Le V, Luu D, Lopes CV, Cramer SC. A tele-assessment system for monitoring treatment effects in subjects with spinal cord injury. J Telemed Telecare. 2010;16(3):152-7. doi: 10.1258/jtt.2009.090703. [PubMed: 20386036].
  • 13. Ito J, Edirippulige S, Aono T, Armfield NR. The use of telemedicine for delivering healthcare in Japan: Systematic review of literature published in Japanese and English languages. J Telemed Telecare. 2017;23(10):828-34. doi: 10.1177/1357633X17732801. [PubMed: 29081269].
  • 14. Naik S, Wykoff CC, Ou WC, Stevenson J, Gupta S, Shah AR. Identification of factors to increase efficacy of telemedicine screening for diabetic retinopathy in endocrinology practices using the intelligent retinal imaging system (IRIS) platform. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2018;140:265-70. doi: 10.1016/j.diabres.2018.04.011. [PubMed: 29649538].
  • 15. Patil SA, Cross RK. Current landscape of telemedicine practice in inflammatory bowel disease. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2018. doi: 10.1093/ibd/izy113. [PubMed: 29718218].
  • 16. Hassan A, Dorsey ER, Goetz CG, Bloem BR, Guttman M, Tanner CM, et al. Telemedicine use for movement disorders: A global survey. Telemed J E Health. 2018;24(12):979-92. doi: 10.1089/tmj.2017.0295. [PubMed: 29565764].
  • 17. Portaro S, Calabro RS, Bramanti P, Silvestri G, Torrisi M, Conti-Nibali V, et al. Telemedicine for facio-scapulo-humeral muscular dystrophy: A multidisciplinary approach to improve quality of life and reduce hospitalization rate? Disabil Health J. 2018;11(2):306-9. doi: 10.1016/j.dhjo.2017.09.003. [PubMed: 28967584].
  • 18. Van Straaten MG, Cloud BA, Morrow MM, Ludewig PM, Zhao KD. Effectiveness of home exercise on pain, function, and strength of manual wheelchair users with spinal cord injury: A high-dose shoulder program with telerehabilitation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2014;95(10):1810-1817 e2. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2014.05.004. [PubMed: 24887534]. [PubMed Central: PMC4182115].
  • 19. Arora M, Harvey LA, Hayes AJ, Chhabra HS, Glinsky JV, Cameron ID, et al. Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of telephone-based support versus usual care for treatment of pressure ulcers in people with spinal cord injury in low-income and middle-income countries: Study protocol for a 12-week randomised controlled trial. BMJ Open. 2015;5(7). e008369. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-008369. [PubMed: 26220871]. [PubMed Central: PMC4521536].
  • 20. Coulter EH, McLean AN, Hasler JP, Allan DB, McFadyen A, Paul L. The effectiveness and satisfaction of web-based physiotherapy in people with spinal cord injury: A pilot randomised controlled trial. Spinal Cord. 2017;55(4):383-9. doi: 10.1038/sc.2016.125. [PubMed: 27596027].
  • 21. Houlihan BV, Brody M, Everhart-Skeels S, Pernigotti D, Burnett S, Zazula J, et al. Randomized trial of a peer-led, telephone-based empowerment intervention for persons with chronic spinal cord injury improves health self-management. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2017;98(6):1067-1076 e1. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2017.02.005. [PubMed: 28284835].
  • 22. Tung JY, Stead B, Mann W, Popovic MR; Ba'Pham. Assistive technologies for self-managed pressure ulcer prevention in spinal cord injury: A scoping review. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2015;52(2):131-46. doi: 10.1682/JRRD.2014.02.0064. [PubMed: 26237111].
  • 23. Vuckovic A, Jajrees M, Purcell M, Berry H, Fraser M. Electroencephalographic predictors of neuropathic pain in subacute spinal cord injury. J Pain. 2018;19(11):1256 e1-1256 e17. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2018.04.011. [PubMed: 29751110].
  • 24. Grigsby J, Kaehny MM, Sandberg EJ, Schlenker RE, Shaughnessy PW. Effects and effectiveness of telemedicine. Health Care Financ Rev. 1995;17(1):115-31. [PubMed: 10153466]. [PubMed Central: PMC4193577].
  • 25. Leenen LAM, Wijnen BFM, de Kinderen RJA, van Heugten CM, Evers S, Majoie M. Are people with epilepsy using eHealth-tools? Epilepsy Behav. 2016;64(Pt A):268-72. doi: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2016.08.007. [PubMed: 27780086].
  • 26. Ackery A, Tator C, Krassioukov A. A global perspective on spinal cord injury epidemiology. J Neurotrauma. 2004;21(10):1355-70. doi: 10.1089/neu.2004.21.1355. [PubMed: 15672627].
  • 27. Alghamdi M, Gashgari H, Househ M. A systematic review of mobile health technology use in developing countries. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2015;213:223-6. [PubMed: 26152999].
  • 28. Chiang KF, Wang HH. Nurses' experiences of using a smart mobile device application to assist home care for patients with chronic disease: A qualitative study. J Clin Nurs. 2016;25(13-14):2008-17. doi: 10.1111/jocn.13231. [PubMed: 27136280].
  • 29. Sabatier MJ, Stoner L, Mahoney ET, Black C, Elder C, Dudley GA, et al. Electrically stimulated resistance training in SCI individuals increases muscle fatigue resistance but not femoral artery size or blood flow. Spinal Cord. 2006;44(4):227-33. doi: 10.1038/sj.sc.3101834. [PubMed: 16158074].
  • 30. Dolbow DR, Gorgey AS, Ketchum JM, Moore JR, Hackett LA, Gater DR. Exercise adherence during home-based functional electrical stimulation cycling by individuals with spinal cord injury. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2012;91(11):922-30. doi: 10.1097/PHM.0b013e318269d89f. [PubMed: 23085704].
  • 31. Gorgey AS, Lester RM, Wade RC, Khalil RE, Khan RK, Anderson ML, et al. A feasibility pilot using telehealth videoconference monitoring of home-based NMES resistance training in persons with spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord Ser Cases. 2017;3:17039. doi: 10.1038/scsandc.2017.39. [PubMed: 29021917]. [PubMed Central: PMC5633749].
  • 32. Halstead LS, Dang T, Elrod M, Convit RJ, Rosen MJ, Woods S. Teleassessment compared with live assessment of pressure ulcers in a wound clinic: A pilot study. Adv Skin Wound Care. 2003;16(2):91-6. [PubMed: 12690232].
  • 33. Houghton PE, Campbell K. Canadian best practice guidelines for the prevention and management of pressure ulcers in people with spinal cord injury: A resource handbook for clinicians. Ontario Neurotrauma Foundation; 2013.
  • 34. Russell TG. Physical rehabilitation using telemedicine. J Telemed Telecare. 2007;13(5):217-20. doi: 10.1258/135763307781458886. [PubMed: 17697506].
  • 35. Vesmarovich S, Walker T, Hauber RP, Temkin A, Burns R. Use of telerehabilitation to manage pressure ulcers in persons with spinal cord injuries. Adv Wound Care. 1999;12(5):264-9. [PubMed: 10655800].
  • 36. Sanford JA, Griffiths PC, Richardson P, Hargraves K, Butterfield T, Hoenig H. The effects of in-home rehabilitation on task self-efficacy in mobility-impaired adults: A randomized clinical trial. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2006;54(11):1641-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2006.00913.x. [PubMed: 17087689].
  • 37. Dallolio L, Menarini M, China S, Ventura M, Stainthorpe A, Soopramanien A, et al. Functional and clinical outcomes of telemedicine in patients with spinal cord injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2008;89(12):2332-41. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2008.06.012. [PubMed: 19061746].
  • 38. Irgens I, Rekand T, Arora M, Liu N, Marshall R, Biering-Sorensen F, et al. Telehealth for people with spinal cord injury: A narrative review. Spinal Cord. 2018;56(7):643-55. doi: 10.1038/s41393-017-0033-3. [PubMed: 29515211].
  • 39. Kurtzke JF. Epidemiology of spinal cord injury. Neurol Neurocir Psiquiatr. 1977;18(2-3 Suppl):157-91. [PubMed: 616527].
  • 40. Rahimi-Movaghar V, Saadat S, Rasouli MR, Ganji S, Ghahramani M, Zarei MR, et al. Prevalence of spinal cord injury in Tehran, Iran. J Spinal Cord Med. 2009;32(4):428-31. [PubMed: 19777865]. [PubMed Central: PMC2830683].

Featured Image:

Creative Commons License Except where otherwise noted, this work is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial 4.0 International License .

Search Relations:

Author(s):

Article(s):

Create Citiation Alert
via Google Reader

Readers' Comments