Platelet Indices for Predicting Patient Outcomes in Post-Neurosurgical Meningitis

AUTHORS

Leila Simani 1 , Mahbobeh Oroei 2 , Hasan Sadeghi 3 , Mahdi Amirdosara 3 , Arezoo Chouhdari 1 , Omidvar Rezaei 1 , Mohammadreza Hajiesmaeili 3 , *

AUTHORS INFORMATION

1 Skull Base Research Center, Loghman Hakim Hospital, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

2 Hearing Disorders Research Center, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

3 Anesthesiology Research Center, Loghman Hakim Medical Center, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

ARTICLE INFORMATION

Archives of Neuroscience: 6 (2); e82911
Published Online: February 18, 2019
Article Type: Research Article
Received: August 4, 2018
Revised: October 28, 2018
Accepted: December 12, 2018
Crossmark

Crossmark

CHEKING

READ FULL TEXT
Abstract

Background: Platelet volume indices (PVIs) are inexpensive and readily available parameters in intensive care units (ICUs). However, their association with mortality has never been investigated in the post-neurosurgical meningitis (PNM).

Objectives: This study was designed to investigate the association of PVIs with mortality in PNM patients.

Methods: This retrospective study was conducted in the adult patients undergone various neurosurgical procedures in a neurosurgery department at a tertiary educational medical center in Tehran from 2016 to 2017. In this study, platelet indices including mean platelet volume (MPV), platelet distribution width (PDW), and platelet count were measured on ICU admission.

Results: A total of 37 patients were included, 18 of whom survived (mortality rate: 50%). PDW and MPV values were significantly higher in non-survivors than in survivors. In non-survivor patients, platelet count was significantly lower and PDW was higher at diagnosis and discharge when compared to on admission. Also, there was no significant linear correlation between Charlson comorbidity index (CCI) and platelet indices. The means of these parameters showed no significant differences in CCI categories between the two patient subgroups.

Conclusions: The obtained data revealed that the high levels of MPV and PDW in PNM are not associated with the increased risk of mortality, whereas the decrease in plateletcrit was not associated with increased risk of mortality.

Keywords

PLT MPV PDW Post-Neurological Meningitis

Copyright © 2019, Archives of Neuroscience. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits copy and redistribute the material just in noncommercial usages, provided the original work is properly cited.
1. Background

Post-neurosurgical meningitis (PNM) is a severe complication that leads to high mortality rates, prolonged hospitalization, severe neurologic sequelae, and increased hospital costs. Since the number of high-quality, randomized controlled trials for the management of PNM is limited, the diagnostic and therapeutic approaches are mainly according to low-quality evidence and personal experience (1).

Platelet volume indices (PVIs) are a set of platelet (PLT) variables that can be measured regularly in whole blood count using various automated analyzers. Mean platelet volume (MPV) and platelet distribution width (PDW) are two prominent parameters that are also commonly measured.

MPV is a machine-calculated item that exhibits plateletcrit to platelet count ratio and is an accurate marker of platelet function. PDW defines the distribution width at the level of 20% in the size of platelet distribution curve that reveals how uniform the platelets are in size in a blood sample (2).

The PVIs are potential platelet activity biomarkers that are suggested to be linked to systemic inflammatory responses (3). Since the measurement of these parameters is inexpensive and easily accessible in many institutions, they can readily provide comprehensive clinical examinations regarding PVI values for prognostic and diagnostic purposes in various settings (4). A reduction in PLT count is an independent risk factor for critically-ill patients admitted to intensive care units (ICUs) (5).

Based on the growing lines of evidence, the above-mentioned parameters are useful in the differential diagnosis of bacterial and tuberculous meningitis (6), defining the severity of illness and predicting the mortality in critically ill-patients (7). These parameters are also individually linked to mortality in unselected ICU patients (4).

2. Objectives

Considering the fact that the risk of mortality in patients with PNM is high, risk stratification can help clinicians with the management of these patients. Hence, by establishing a link between PVI and clinical outcome, we would be able to obtain further insight into the common PNM pathways. Therefore, this study was designed to evaluate the association of PVIs with clinical outcomes in PNM patients.

3. Methods

This retrospective study was conducted among patients with confirmed diagnosis of meningitis who underwent various neurosurgical procedures in the department of neurosurgery at a tertiary university medical center, Tehran, Iran from 2016 to 2017. The complete medical history, clinical and biochemical evaluations, and complete blood cell count on the days of admission, diagnosis, and discharge were recorded.

The exclusion criteria were (1) pregnant and breastfeeding women; (2) patients with active hemorrhage; (3) those with hematological diseases; (4) patients who had received infusion or PLTs prior to admission; (5) patients who had used anticoagulants prior to admission; (6) and those who received radiotherapy or chemotherapy or bone marrow transplantation one month prior to admission. This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.

3.1. Statistical Analysis

All the statistical analyses were performed using SSPS version 16.0 (SPSS, Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). Chi-square test was employed to analyze categorical data. Independent t-test, paired t-test, multivariate logistic regression, and repeated measures analysis of variance (ANOVA) were run for comparison of numeric values. We calculated Charlson comorbidity index (CCI) (8) and presented the mean ± standard deviation (SD). Also, we used four categories based on CCI that consists of none (0), mild (1 - 2), moderate (3 - 4) and severe (≥ 5). Spearman rank correlation test was carried out to determine the linear relationship between two variables that had no prerequisite for a parametric correlation test. The values for each group are expressed as mean ± SD. P value less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

4. Results

A total of 37 PNM patients consisting of 16 (43.2%) females and 21 (56.8%) males were included in this study. The mean age of the patients was 44.97 ± 17.35 years. Here, the most frequent diagnosis was neuro-oncology diseases (67.6%). Twenty-six (70.3%) of the patients had respiratory failure and received mechanical ventilation (Table 1).

Table 1. Characteristics of the Patients Based on Survival Status
VariableTotalSurvivors (N = 18)Non-Survivors (N = 19)P Value
Age, y44.97 ± 17.3540.11 ± 15.2149.57 ± 18.370.09
Sex, No. (%)0.19
Female16 (43.2)10 (27.0)6 (16.2)
Male21 (56.8)8 (21.6)13 (35.1)
Diagnosis, No. (%)NA
Neuro-oncology25 (67.6)15 (60.0)10 (40.0)
Neuro-vascular7 (18.9)1 (14.3)6 (85.7)
Head injury5 (13.5)2 (40.0)3 (60.0)
Mechanical ventilation, No. (%)26 (70.3)8 (21.6)18 (48.6)0.001
Blood culture, No. (%)5 (13.5)0 (0)5 (13.5)0.01
CSF culture, No. (%)6 (16.2)2 (5.4)4 (10.8)0.660
Laboratory parameters
WBC, ×103/µL12.09 ± 7.111.1 ± 6.113.03 ± 7.90.41
CRP, mg/dL50.07 ± 40.6442.53 ± 39.8458.76 ± 41.360.33
Platelet, ×103/µL198.18 ± 101.57243.61 ± 71.39155.15 ± 108.640.006
PDW, %14.45 ± 3.812.72 ± 2.9016.08 ± 3.90.006
MPV, fL10.10 ± 1.59.55 ± 1.210.63 ± 1.660.030
CCI, mean ± SD2.08 ± 2.321.05 ± 1.303.05 ± 2.670.016
CCI categories, No. (%)NA
None, CCI 013 (35.1)9 (50.0)4 (21.1)
Mild, CCI 1 - 212 (32.4)6 (33.3)6 (31.5)
Moderate, CCI 3 - 47 (18.9)3 (16.7)4 (21.1)
Severe, CCI ≥ 55 (13.5)0 (0.0)5 (26.3)

Abbreviations: CCI, Charlson comorbidity index; CRP, c-reactive protein; CSF, cerebrocpinal fluid; MPV, mean platelet volume; NA, not applicable; PDW, platelet distribution width; WBC, white blood cell.

As shown in Table 1, a significant difference was found in the laboratory parameters. Here, platelet count was significantly lower in non-survivors than survivors (P = 0.006) and PDW and MPV were higher in dead patients (P = 0.006 and P = 0.030, respectively). In order to compare PVIs at the times of admission, diagnosis, and discharge, we assessed PVI parameters at different time points in surviving and non-surviving patients.

In non-surviving patients, significant differences were detected in PLT and PDW levels at different time points (P = 0.007 and P = 0.001, respectively). In this regard, platelet count was significantly lower and PDW was higher at diagnosis and discharge as compared to the time of admission; however, no significant difference was found in MPV level at different time points (P > 0.05). On the other hand, in the survivors group, there were no significant differences in PVIs between various evaluation times (Figure 1).

The difference in platelet count (A) and platelet distribution width (B) between T1 with T2 in the survivor and the non-survivor groups. T1-admission; T2-diagnosis; T3-discharge (P < 0.001)
Figure 1. The difference in platelet count (A) and platelet distribution width (B) between T1 with T2 in the survivor and the non-survivor groups. T1-admission; T2-diagnosis; T3-discharge (P < 0.001)

According to univariate analysis, the platelet indices, sepsis, pneumonia, and ventilation were significantly associated with outcome. Considering the small number of outcome events, we analyzed multivariate regression with some variables and found no significant adjusted odds ratios (Table 2). However, we recommend this analysis with an appropriate event number.

Table 2. The Estimation of Mortality Odds Ratio for Study-Specific Variablesa, b
VariableUnivariateMultivariate
Odds Ratio95% CIP ValueOdds Ratio95% CIP Value
PLT0.9890.981 - 0.9980.0140.9940.918 - 1.0070.385
PDW1.3471.059 - 1.7130.0151.1720.700 - 1.9630.547
MPV1.6951.026 - 2.8010.0390.7300.230 - 2.3140.593
Sepsis
No---
Yes18.8892.075 - 171.9640.0099.8280.313 - 308.1800.194
Pneumonia
No---
Yes13.7142.406 - 78.1830.0034.1580.246 - 70.1470.323
Steroid
No---
Yes0.9290.218 - 3.9640.9202.7900.044 - 171.0940.628
Ventilation
No---
Yes22.5002.449 - 206.7360.0066.0140.325 - 111.2860.779
Charlson comorbidity index1.6731.085 - 2.5780.0202.0110.918 - 4.4070.081

a Univariate and multivariate logistic regression for eight variables.

b Significance level < 0.05.

On follow-up, 19 (51.3%) patients had died, the mean age of whom was 49.57 ± 18.37 years, and only 5 (26.3%) of them had severe comorbidity scores. The mean CCI of non-survivors was 3.05 ± 2.67 versus 1.05 ± 1.30 in the survivors (P = 0.016). Also, there were 12 (32.4%) patients with mild CCI, 7 (18.9%) patients with moderate CCI, 5 (13.5%) patients with severe CCI and 13 (35.1%) patients without CCI (Table 1). Moreover, there was no significant linear correlation between CCI and platelet parameters (PLT, r = -0.301 and P = 0.07; PDW, r = 0.143 and P = 0.39; MPV, r = 0.267 and P = 0.11). The means of these parameters showed no significant differences in CCI categories between the two patient subgroups (Table 3).

Table 3. The Association Between Charlson Comorbidity Index and Platelet Parameters in Non-Survivors and Survivors
VariablesPLTPDWMPV
CCI CategoriesSurvivorsNon-SurvivorsSurvivorsNon-SurvivorsSurvivorsNon-Survivors
None237.77 ± 72.30200.00 ± 121.7612.96 ± 3.2714.35 ± 2.919.80 ± 1.278.92 ± 0.45
Mild216.50 ± 53.27126.83 ± 63.6313.16 ± 3.0317.33 ± 5.119.31 ± 1.2311.01 ± 2.08
Moderate315.33 ± 72.39209.00 ± 189.9611.13 ± 1.2016.12 ± 3.179.26 ± 1.1511.37 ± 1.02
Severe-110.20 ± 35.03-15.96 ± 4.30-10.96 ± 1.52
P value0.1370.7380.6060.7470.7020.131
5. Discussion

In this study, we provide insight into the role of PVIs in the pathophysiology of PNM patients. We found that those PNM patients who died had lower PLT count and higher MPV and PDW levels than those who survived. In addition, we demonstrated that CCIs in non-survivors were higher than in survivors, but there was no significant association between CCI and platelet parameters.

It has been widely accepted that in normal physiological conditions, the number of PLTs in the blood remains in equilibrium due to regular elimination and regeneration mechanisms. Thus, PLT count or its morphology remains relatively constant. However, under pathophysiological conditions, any factor which can prevent the regeneration of PLT can increase the death rate and overcome the capacity of self-regulation. In this condition, both PLT count and morphology can be changed, which can be detected in the results of PLT indices (7). According to the wide range of studies, it has been shown that PLT indices change following trauma, systemic inflammatory reaction syndrome, severe infection, activation of the coagulation system, and thrombotic diseases. Furthermore, the increased levels of MPV and PDW were suggested as the predictors of poor outcomes in a variety of diseases such as sleep apnea syndrome (9), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (10), myocardial infarction (11), and infection (12).

Our findings are consistent with those of another investigation that reported reduced PLT count and increased MPV and PDW were independent risk factors for mortality even after they were adjusted for other covariates related to clinical variables. In this regard, Zhang et al. (7) demonstrated that patients admitted to ICU with abnormally low PLT count and high levels of MPV and PDW exhibited severe illness and higher risk of mortality in comparison to those with normal PLT indices. They proposed PLT count, MPV, and PDW as independent risk factors for mortality. Moreover, several studies showed that elevated levels of MPV and PDW were linked to increased rate of mortality in cardiovascular diseases patients (13, 14). Also, another study showed that in sepsis or septic shock patients, hospital mortality was negatively correlated with PLT and PCT values and positively correlated with MPV and PDW values (15). In addition, Camara-Lemarroy et al. demonstrated that platelet count was lower and MPV was higher in patients with bacterial meningitis compared to those with tuberculosis (6).

The inflammatory response can be a feasible explanation for the observed association between platelet indices and mortality rate. According to the growing body of evidence, inflammatory response is remarkably related to undesirable clinical outcomes in ICU patients. The level of inflammation in critically-ill patients can be identified by several biomarkers such as C-reactive protein, which is a prominent inflammatory biomarker significantly correlated with mortality in various conditions (14, 16-18). Reduction in PLT has been proved to be one of the independent risk factors for ICU patients (7).

It is worth noting that the current study had several limitations. Here, due to specified inclusion and exclusion criteria, a number of patients were excluded that inevitably resulted in limited sample size. Also, the obtained results revealed a relationship between low platelet count and mortality; however, a causal relationship between them cannot be inferred based on the present study.

In summary, PLT indices are valuable indicators of clinical outcomes. Non-surviving PNM patients had lower platelet counts and higher MPV and PDW values than survivors. Despite the higher CCIs in non-survivors, there was no significant association between CCI and platelet parameters.

Acknowledgements
Footnotes
References
  • 1. Hussein K, Bitterman R, Shofty B, Paul M, Neuberger A. Management of post-neurosurgical meningitis: Narrative review. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2017;23(9):621-8. doi: 10.1016/j.cmi.2017.05.013. [PubMed: 28529027].
  • 2. Kaito K, Otsubo H, Usui N, Yoshida M, Tanno J, Kurihara E, et al. Platelet size deviation width, platelet large cell ratio, and mean platelet volume have sufficient sensitivity and specificity in the diagnosis of immune thrombocytopenia. Br J Haematol. 2005;128(5):698-702. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2141.2004.05357.x. [PubMed: 15725092].
  • 3. Ozturk ZA, Dag MS, Kuyumcu ME, Cam H, Yesil Y, Yilmaz N, et al. Could platelet indices be new biomarkers for inflammatory bowel diseases? Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2013;17(3):334-41. [PubMed: 23426536].
  • 4. Zhang Z, Xu X, Ni H, Deng H. Platelet indices are novel predictors of hospital mortality in intensive care unit patients. J Crit Care. 2014;29(5):885 e1-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2014.04.020. [PubMed: 24895093].
  • 5. Sezgi C, Taylan M, Kaya H, Selimoglu Sen H, Abakay O, Demir M, et al. Alterations in platelet count and mean platelet volume as predictors of patient outcome in the respiratory intensive care unit. Clin Respir J. 2015;9(4):403-8. doi: 10.1111/crj.12151. [PubMed: 24725778].
  • 6. Camara-Lemarroy CR, Delgado-Garcia G, De la Cruz-Gonzalez JG, Villareal-Velazquez HJ, Gongora-Rivera F. Mean platelet volume in the differential diagnosis of tuberculous and bacterial meningitis. J Infect Dev Ctries. 2017;11(2):166-72. doi: 10.3855/jidc.7478. [PubMed: 28248678].
  • 7. Zhang S, Cui YL, Diao MY, Chen DC, Lin ZF. Use of platelet indices for determining illness severity and predicting prognosis in critically Ill patients. Chin Med J (Engl). 2015;128(15):2012-8. doi: 10.4103/0366-6999.161346. [PubMed: 26228211]. [PubMed Central: PMC4717961].
  • 8. Andersen FH, Flaatten H, Klepstad P, Romild U, Kvale R. Long-term survival and quality of life after intensive care for patients 80 years of age or older. Ann Intensive Care. 2015;5(1):53. doi: 10.1186/s13613-015-0053-0. [PubMed: 26055187]. [PubMed Central: PMC4456598].
  • 9. Nena E, Papanas N, Steiropoulos P, Zikidou P, Zarogoulidis P, Pita E, et al. Mean platelet volume and platelet distribution width in non-diabetic subjects with obstructive sleep apnoea syndrome: New indices of severity? Platelets. 2012;23(6):447-54. doi: 10.3109/09537104.2011.632031. [PubMed: 22070405].
  • 10. Steiropoulos P, Papanas N, Nena E, Xanthoudaki M, Goula T, Froudarakis M, et al. Mean platelet volume and platelet distribution width in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: The role of comorbidities. Angiology. 2013;64(7):535-9. doi: 10.1177/0003319712461436. [PubMed: 23052724].
  • 11. Kirbas O, Kurmus O, Koseoglu C, Duran Karaduman B, Saatci Yasar A, Alemdar R, et al. Association between admission mean platelet volume and ST segment resolution after thrombolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction. Anadolu Kardiyol Derg. 2014;14(8):728-32. doi: 10.5152/akd.2014.5078. [PubMed: 25188762].
  • 12. Al-Sweedan SA, Alhaj M. The effect of low altitude on blood count parameters. Hematol Oncol Stem Cell Ther. 2012;5(3):158-61. doi: 10.5144/1658-3876.2012.158. [PubMed: 23095792].
  • 13. Shah B, Oberweis B, Tummala L, Amoroso NS, Lobach I, Sedlis SP, et al. Mean platelet volume and long-term mortality in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. Am J Cardiol. 2013;111(2):185-9. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2012.09.014. [PubMed: 23102880]. [PubMed Central: PMC3538911].
  • 14. Eisen A, Bental T, Assali A, Kornowski R, Lev EI. Mean platelet volume as a predictor for long-term outcome after percutaneous coronary intervention. J Thromb Thrombolysis. 2013;36(4):469-74. doi: 10.1007/s11239-013-0876-1. [PubMed: 23345043].
  • 15. Gao Y, Li Y, Yu X, Guo S, Ji X, Sun T, et al. The impact of various platelet indices as prognostic markers of septic shock. PLoS One. 2014;9(8). e103761. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0103761. [PubMed: 25118886]. [PubMed Central: PMC4131909].
  • 16. Ranzani OT, Prada LF, Zampieri FG, Battaini LC, Pinaffi JV, Setogute YC, et al. Failure to reduce C-reactive protein levels more than 25% in the last 24 hours before intensive care unit discharge predicts higher in-hospital mortality: A cohort study. J Crit Care. 2012;27(5):525 e9-15. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2011.10.013. [PubMed: 22227090].
  • 17. Tschaikowsky K, Hedwig-Geissing M, Braun GG, Radespiel-Troeger M. Predictive value of procalcitonin, interleukin-6, and C-reactive protein for survival in postoperative patients with severe sepsis. J Crit Care. 2011;26(1):54-64. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2010.04.011. [PubMed: 20646905].
  • 18. Grander W, Dunser M, Stollenwerk B, Siebert U, Dengg C, Koller B, et al. C-reactive protein levels and post-ICU mortality in nonsurgical intensive care patients. Chest. 2010;138(4):856-62. doi: 10.1378/chest.09-1677. [PubMed: 20173056].
  • COMMENTS

    LEAVE A COMMENT HERE: