Spinal cord injury (SCI) is a devastating condition often affecting young and healthy individuals around the world. This debilitating condition not only creates enormous physical and emotional cost to individuals but also is a significant financial burden to the society (
1). Spinal cord injury occurs in various countries throughout the world with an annual incidence of 15 to 40 cases per million, with the causes of these injuries ranging from motor vehicle accidents and community violence to recreational activities and workplace-related injuries. Survival has improved along with a greater appreciation of patterns of presentation, survival, and complications. Despite much work having been done, the only treatment to date known to ameliorate neurologic dysfunction that occurs at or below the level of neurologic injury has been intravenous methylprednisolone therapy. Much research over the past 30 to 40 years has focused on elucidating the mechanisms of spinal cord injury, with the complex pathophysiologic processes slowly being unraveled. With a greater understanding of both primary and secondary mechanisms of injury, the roles of calcium, free radicals, sodium, excitatory amino acids, vascular mediators, and apoptosis have been elucidated ( 2). A systematic review by Rahimi Movaghar and colleagues found the incidence of SCI in developing countries to be 25.5/million/year (95% CI: 21.7 - 29.4/million/year) ranging from 2.1 to 130.7/million/year. Males comprised 82.8% (95% CI: 80.3 - 85.2) of all SCIs with a mean age of 32.4 years (95% CI: 29.7-35.2). The two leading causes of SCI were found to be motor vehicle crashes (41.4%; 95% CI: 35.4 - 47.4) and falls (34.9%; 95% CI: 26.7 - 43.1). Complete SCIs were found to be more common than incomplete injuries (complete SCI: 56.5%; 95% CI: 47.6-65.3; incomplete SCI: 43.0%; 95% CI: 34.1-52.0). Similarly, paraplegia was found to be more common than tetraplegia (paraplegia: 58.7%; 95% CI: 51.5 - 66.0; tetraplegia: 40.6%; 95% CI: 33.3 - 48.0) ( 3). Prevalence of traumatic spinal cord injury is estimated to be around 440 per million in the population of Tehran ( 4). Whiteneck G. and colleagues investigated environmental barriers reported by people with spinal cord injury (SCI)( 5). The top five environmental barriers reported by subjects with SCI, in descending order of importance, were the natural environment, transportation, need for help at home, availability of health care, and governmental policies. A review by Hammell ( 6), concerning quality of life following high spinal cord injury explored relevant articles for the period of 1990 - 2003 and tried to figure out the main contributing factors to a higher quality of life among affected individuals. Here are some of findings:
•A small number of researchers have reported that perceptions of satisfactory QOL are negatively correlated with the level of spinal cord lesion, although this association is not generally found to be statistically significant. In contrast, a substantial body of research has found no correlation between QOL/life satisfaction and level of SCI: the degree of impairment or extent of physical independence.
•Quantitative research among people with all levels of SCI has demonstrated a positive correlations between QOL/life satisfaction and self-assessed health, perceived social support, social functioning/integration, mobility, accessibility (home/health care), preferred living situation, adequate income, perceptions of having control over one's life, marital status, satisfaction with relationships,community access/participation and satisfaction with occupational engagement and/or employment status.
•Life satisfaction/QOL has been reported to be negatively correlated with re-hospitalizations/perceptions of poor health (including respiratory problems and pressure sores), pain, spasticity, inadequate income, reduced life opportunities, reduced social interaction, loneliness and boredom, unemployment/dissatisfaction with occupations, reduced mobility, residence in a nursing home, and perceptions of having reduced control over one's life.
•The researcher suggested a solution for the problems associated with SCI at both the cellular and the societal levels. Considering the fact that social, physical, economic, legal and political environments increase the problems confronted by people with SCI and reduce their quality of life, interventions must be targeted not solely at individuals, teaching them to live in a world designed to meet the needs of the dominant population, but also at public policies and community planning. Commitment to reduce, for example, pain, spasticity, pressure sores and respiratory problems (factors equated with poor QOL) should be matched by a commitment to reduce, for example, nursing home admissions, occupational deprivation, inadequate access to health-care and poverty (also factors associated with poor QOL). How this might be accomplished would be a worthy avenue for future research.
7) found that 'rehabilitation entails a highly stressful re-socialization process into an 'inferior' status' and that the process of 'accepting' disability necessitates 'the relinquishing of majority status rights'. 'Adjustment' to disability, as argued, is not so much a psychological process but a process of adjusting to changes in others' perceptions, in social positioning, and in access to educational, economic and social opportunities. Indeed, the onset of impairment has been described as the experience of a 'fall from privilege'. In 2011 Babamohamadi and colleagues studied coping strategies in eighteen Iranian patients with SCI and found the most commonly used strategies were seeking help from religious beliefs (understanding the disease as a divine fate and as a spiritual combat), hope and making efforts towards independence/self-care, emphasizing the importance of independence in this group ( 8). The same research team in another published research assessed barriers to and facilitators of coping with spinal cord injury for Iranian patients ( 9). After using purposeful sampling for selection of the participants, semi-structured interviews were held for data collection. Lack of "knowledge", "financial resources", "employment opportunities", "suitable facilities and accessibility" as well as "societal acceptance and support" emerged as barriers; and having "self-confidence", "religious beliefs", "support networks" and "positive thinking" emerged as facilitators in coping with spinal cord injury. Participants believed that with these hindering factors in place, adapting to their new condition had been difficult, therefore they could only manage to adapt partially to their situation. Since disabled people of the society are the target group for the present article, different sorts of disabilities are discussed briefly. Disabilities can be divided into five groups: 1) tetraplegia (quadriplegia), 2) paraplegia, 3) spinal cord injury (SCI), 4) cerebral palsy (CP), 5) multiple sclerosis (MS). Tetraplegia is caused by extensive damage to the brain or the spinal cord. The injury, which is known as a lesion, causes victims to lose partial or total function of all four limbs, meaning the arms and legs and the torso. Typical causes of this damage are trauma. However, when the paralysis affects the lower portion of the spinal cord, the quadriplegics have more control over their organs. Unfortunately, devices and tools specific for disables have been rarely devised in Iran. Therefore, this project aims at designing special dishes for this group of people. 1.1. Classification Based on Level of Lesion
Depending on the specific location of the spinal cord injury, severity of lesion varies. Generally, the nearer the damage to the neck, the more severe lesion will result and more organs will be paralyzed. Classification includes:
a) Injuries at the C-1/C-2 part may cause “high-level quadriplegia”.
b) Injuries at the C-6/T1 portion lead to “low-level quadriplegia” (target group of the present project).
a) Injuries at the T2/T5 portion generate “high-level paraplegia”.
b) Injuries at the T6/T12 portion are the sources of “middle-level paraplegia”.
c) Injuries at the L-1/L-5 portion lead to “low-level paraplegia”.
1.2. A Brief Look Over Spinal Cord Injuries
1- Injuries at the C-1/C-2 portion result in the loss of function of the diaphragm
2- Injuries at the C-3/C-4 portion typically result in loss of diaphragm function and biceps.
3- Injuries at C5 portion results in potential loss of function at biceps, and complete loss of function at the wrists and hands.
4- Limited wrist control and complete loss of elbow extensor function but well-functioning biceps indicate injury at the C6 portion.
5- If wrist extensors and internal hand muscles work well but elbow extensors weaken, injury is at the C7 portion.
6- Intact elbow extensors and weak internal hand muscles indicate injury at the C8 portion.
7- Injury at T1 or lower parts doesn’t affect hand function.
8- Injury at L1 or higher parts leads to complete loss of function of thigh adductors.
9- Injury at L2 leads to weak thigh adductors and complete loss of function of knee extensors.
10- Intact thigh adductors, weak knee extensors and paralyzed tibialis anterior muscle indicate injury at the L3 level.
11- Intact knee extensors and weak tibialis anterior muscle and paralyzed big toe extensor indicateL4 injury.
12- If tibialis anterior muscle is intact, thumb extensor acts weakly, and biceps muscle lose function, injury is at the L5 level.
13- If big toe extensor works well, biceps muscles are weak and anus sphincter stop working, injury is at S1 level.
14- Injury at S2 level means that biceps muscles are intact whereas anus sphincter works poorly.