Archives of Neuroscience

Published by: Kowsar

Briefly Glimpsed People are more Attractive

Don A. Vaughn 1 and David M. Eagleman 2 , *
Authors Information
1 UCLA Semel Institute for Neuroscience and Human Behavior, Los Angeles, CA
2 Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University, Stanford, CA
Article information
  • Archives of Neuroscience: January 2017, 4 (1); e28543
  • Published Online: August 6, 2016
  • Article Type: Brief Report
  • Received: February 21, 2016
  • Revised: June 21, 2016
  • Accepted: July 2, 2016
  • DOI: 10.5812/archneurosci.28543

To Cite: Vaughn D A, Eagleman D M. Briefly Glimpsed People are more Attractive, Arch Neurosci. 2017 ; 4(1):e28543. doi: 10.5812/archneurosci.28543.

Abstract
Copyright © 2016, Tehran University of Medical Sciences. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits copy and redistribute the material just in noncommercial usages, provided the original work is properly cited.
1. Background
2. Objectives
3. Methods
4. Results
5. Discussion
Acknowledgements
Footnote
References
  • 1. Hassin R, Trope Y. Facing faces: studies on the cognitive aspects of physiognomy. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2000; 78(5): 837-52[PubMed]
  • 2. Prkachin KM. The consistency of facial expressions of pain: a comparison across modalities. Pain. 1992; 51(3): 297-306[PubMed]
  • 3. Bar M, Neta M, Linz H. Very first impressions. Emotion. 2006; 6(2): 269-78[DOI][PubMed]
  • 4. Locher P, Unger R, Sociedade P, Wahl J. At first glance: Accessibility of the physical attractiveness stereotype. Sex Roles. 1993; 28(11-12): 729-43[DOI]
  • 5. Olson IR, Marshuetz C. Facial attractiveness is appraised in a glance. Emotion. 2005; 5(4): 498-502[DOI][PubMed]
  • 6. Willis J, Todorov A. First impressions: making up your mind after a 100-ms exposure to a face. Psychol Sci. 2006; 17(7): 592-8[DOI][PubMed]
  • 7. Kenrick DT, Li NP, Butner J. Dynamical evolutionary psychology: individual decision rules and emergent social norms. Psychol Rev. 2003; 110(1): 3-28[PubMed]
  • 8. Maner JK, Kenrick DT, Becker DV, Delton AW, Hofer B, Wilbur CJ, et al. Sexually selective cognition: beauty captures the mind of the beholder. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2003; 85(6): 1107-20[DOI][PubMed]
  • 9. Zajonc RB, Reimer DJ, Hausser D. Imprinting and the development of object preference in chicks by mere repeated exposure. J Comp Physiol Psychol. 1973; 83(3): 434-40[PubMed]
  • 10. Peskin M, Newell FN. Familiarity breeds attraction: effects of exposure on the attractiveness of typical and distinctive faces. Perception. 2004; 33(2): 147-57[PubMed]
  • 11. Rhodes G, Halberstadt J, Brajkovich G. Generalization of Mere Exposure Effects to Averaged Composite Faces. Social Cognition. 2001; 19(1): 57-70[DOI]
  • 12. Loftus GR, Harley EM. How different spatial-frequency components contribute to visual information acquisition. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2004; 30(1): 104-18[DOI][PubMed]
  • 13. Vuilleumier P, Armony JL, Driver J, Dolan RJ. Distinct spatial frequency sensitivities for processing faces and emotional expressions. Nat Neurosci. 2003; 6(6): 624-31[DOI][PubMed]
  • 14. Geisler WS, Kersten D. Illusions, perception and Bayes. Nat Neurosci. 2002; 5(6): 508-10[DOI][PubMed]
  • 15. Changizi MA, Hall WG. Thirst modulates a perception. Perception. 2001; 30(12): 1489-97[PubMed]
  • 16. Haselton MG. The sexual overperception bias: Evidence of a systematic bias in men from a survey of naturally occurring events. J Res Pers. 2003; 37(1): 34-47[DOI]
  • 17. Kersten D, Yuille A. Bayesian models of object perception. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2003; 13(2): 150-8[PubMed]
  • 18. Haselton MG, Buss DM. Error management theory: a new perspective on biases in cross-sex mind reading. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2000; 78(1): 81-91[PubMed]
  • 19. Knill DC, Richards W. Perception as Bayesian Inference. 1996; [DOI]
  • 20. Kranz F, Ishai A. Face perception is modulated by sexual preference. Curr Biol. 2006; 16(1): 63-8[DOI][PubMed]
  • 21. Sprecher S, Sullivan Q, Hatfield E. Mate selection preferences: gender differences examined in a national sample. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1994; 66(6): 1074-80[PubMed]
  • 22. Buss DM, Barnes M. Preferences in human mate selection. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1986; 50(3): 559-70[DOI]
  • 23. Casey SJ, Mernagh M, Newell FN. Are attractive facial characteristics peculiar to the sex of a face? Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2009; 62(5): 833-43[DOI][PubMed]
Creative Commons License Except where otherwise noted, this work is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial 4.0 International License .
Readers' Comments