Archives of Neuroscience

Published by: Kowsar

Briefly Glimpsed People are more Attractive

Don A. Vaughn 1 and David M. Eagleman 2 , *
Authors Information
1 UCLA Semel Institute for Neuroscience and Human Behavior, Los Angeles, CA
2 Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University, Stanford, CA
Article information
  • Archives of Neuroscience: January 2017, 4 (1); e28543
  • Published Online: August 6, 2016
  • Article Type: Brief Report
  • Received: February 21, 2016
  • Revised: June 21, 2016
  • Accepted: July 2, 2016
  • DOI: 10.5812/archneurosci.28543

To Cite: Vaughn D A, Eagleman D M. Briefly Glimpsed People are more Attractive, Arch Neurosci. 2017 ; 4(1):e28543. doi: 10.5812/archneurosci.28543.

Copyright © 2016, Tehran University of Medical Sciences. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License ( which permits copy and redistribute the material just in noncommercial usages, provided the original work is properly cited.
1. Background
2. Objectives
3. Methods
4. Results
5. Discussion
  • 1. Hassin R, Trope Y. Facing faces: studies on the cognitive aspects of physiognomy. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2000; 78(5): 837-52[PubMed]
  • 2. Prkachin KM. The consistency of facial expressions of pain: a comparison across modalities. Pain. 1992; 51(3): 297-306[PubMed]
  • 3. Bar M, Neta M, Linz H. Very first impressions. Emotion. 2006; 6(2): 269-78[DOI][PubMed]
  • 4. Locher P, Unger R, Sociedade P, Wahl J. At first glance: Accessibility of the physical attractiveness stereotype. Sex Roles. 1993; 28(11-12): 729-43[DOI]
  • 5. Olson IR, Marshuetz C. Facial attractiveness is appraised in a glance. Emotion. 2005; 5(4): 498-502[DOI][PubMed]
  • 6. Willis J, Todorov A. First impressions: making up your mind after a 100-ms exposure to a face. Psychol Sci. 2006; 17(7): 592-8[DOI][PubMed]
  • 7. Kenrick DT, Li NP, Butner J. Dynamical evolutionary psychology: individual decision rules and emergent social norms. Psychol Rev. 2003; 110(1): 3-28[PubMed]
  • 8. Maner JK, Kenrick DT, Becker DV, Delton AW, Hofer B, Wilbur CJ, et al. Sexually selective cognition: beauty captures the mind of the beholder. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2003; 85(6): 1107-20[DOI][PubMed]
  • 9. Zajonc RB, Reimer DJ, Hausser D. Imprinting and the development of object preference in chicks by mere repeated exposure. J Comp Physiol Psychol. 1973; 83(3): 434-40[PubMed]
  • 10. Peskin M, Newell FN. Familiarity breeds attraction: effects of exposure on the attractiveness of typical and distinctive faces. Perception. 2004; 33(2): 147-57[PubMed]
  • 11. Rhodes G, Halberstadt J, Brajkovich G. Generalization of Mere Exposure Effects to Averaged Composite Faces. Social Cognition. 2001; 19(1): 57-70[DOI]
  • 12. Loftus GR, Harley EM. How different spatial-frequency components contribute to visual information acquisition. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2004; 30(1): 104-18[DOI][PubMed]
  • 13. Vuilleumier P, Armony JL, Driver J, Dolan RJ. Distinct spatial frequency sensitivities for processing faces and emotional expressions. Nat Neurosci. 2003; 6(6): 624-31[DOI][PubMed]
  • 14. Geisler WS, Kersten D. Illusions, perception and Bayes. Nat Neurosci. 2002; 5(6): 508-10[DOI][PubMed]
  • 15. Changizi MA, Hall WG. Thirst modulates a perception. Perception. 2001; 30(12): 1489-97[PubMed]
  • 16. Haselton MG. The sexual overperception bias: Evidence of a systematic bias in men from a survey of naturally occurring events. J Res Pers. 2003; 37(1): 34-47[DOI]
  • 17. Kersten D, Yuille A. Bayesian models of object perception. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2003; 13(2): 150-8[PubMed]
  • 18. Haselton MG, Buss DM. Error management theory: a new perspective on biases in cross-sex mind reading. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2000; 78(1): 81-91[PubMed]
  • 19. Knill DC, Richards W. Perception as Bayesian Inference. 1996; [DOI]
  • 20. Kranz F, Ishai A. Face perception is modulated by sexual preference. Curr Biol. 2006; 16(1): 63-8[DOI][PubMed]
  • 21. Sprecher S, Sullivan Q, Hatfield E. Mate selection preferences: gender differences examined in a national sample. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1994; 66(6): 1074-80[PubMed]
  • 22. Buss DM, Barnes M. Preferences in human mate selection. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1986; 50(3): 559-70[DOI]
  • 23. Casey SJ, Mernagh M, Newell FN. Are attractive facial characteristics peculiar to the sex of a face? Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2009; 62(5): 833-43[DOI][PubMed]
Creative Commons License Except where otherwise noted, this work is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial 4.0 International License .
Readers' Comments